Why Cultivate? Anthropological and Archaeological Approaches to Foraging-farming Transitions in Southeast Asia (McDonald Institute Monographs) (Hardback)
OR try AbeBooks who may have this title (opens in new window).
Short Description for Why Cultivate? Anthropological and Archaeological Approaches to Foraging-farming Transitions in Southeast Asia Does it make sense to understand the prehistory, history and present-day patterns of life in Southeast Asia in terms of a distinction between two ways of life: "farming" and "foraging"? This is the central question addressed by the anthropologists and archaeologists contributing to this volume. Inherent within the question "Why Cultivate?" are people's relationships with the physical world: are th...
Full description- Publisher: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
- Published: 31 December 2011
- Format: Hardback 142 pages
- See: Full bibliographic data
- Categories: Social & Cultural Anthropology | Asian History | Ancient History: To C 500 CE | Archaeology | Prehistoric Archaeology
- ISBN 13: 9781902937588 ISBN 10: 1902937589
- Sales rank: 898,727
Other books
Full description for Why Cultivate? Anthropological and Archaeological Approaches to Foraging-farming Transitions in Southeast Asia
Does it make sense to understand the prehistory, history and present-day patterns of life in Southeast Asia in terms of a distinction between two ways of life: "farming" and "foraging"? This is the central question addressed by the anthropologists and archaeologists contributing to this volume. Inherent within the question "Why Cultivate?" are people's relationships with the physical world: are they primarily to do with subsistence and economics or with social and/or cultural forces? The answers given by the contributors are complex. On a practical level they argue that there is a continuum rather than a sharp break between different levels of management of the environment, but rice-growing usually represents a profound break in people's relations to their cultural and symbolic landscapes. An associated point made by the archaeologists is that the "deep histories" of foraging-farming lifeways that are emerging in this region sit uncomfortably with the theory that foraging was replaced by farming in the mid Holocene as a result of a migration of Austronesian-speaking Neolithic farmers from southern China and Taiwan.
